РЕФОРМЫ СИСТЕМЫ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ И ПОТЕНЦИАЛ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО РАЗВИТИЯ

  • Эндрю Никсон
    • Университет Бирмингема
Ключевые слова: новое государственное управление, политика воздействия, государственное развитие

Аннотация

В представленной работе анализируется влияние, которое оказали управленческие реформы, связанные с Новым Государственным Управлением (НГУ), на усиление потенциала так называемого ‘государственного развития’. В первой части статьи описываются основные принципы, лежащие в основе НГУ-управленческих реформ, предложенных правительствам стран в ответ на реформу бюджетной сферы. Во второй части анализируется степень реализации управленческих реформ в разных частях мира, с особым акцентом на опыт тех стран, где они были изменены или отвергнуты. Третья часть посвящена ‘политике воздействия’; автор исследует вопрос, в какой мере зависимые от помощи страны более склонны, чем другие страны, к проведению таких управленческих реформ. В четвертой части рассматриваются основные черты политики государственного развития, уделяется особое внимание природе бюрократии. Пятая часть посвящена критической оценке того, до какой степени проведение управленческих реформ может способствовать развитию государства. Последний раздел предлагает обобщающие выводы.

Литература


  1. Acemoglu, A. et al (2003) An African success story: Botswana, in Rodrik, D. (2003) (ed.) In search of prosperity: analytic narratives on economic growth. Princeton University Press. Oxford University Press.

  2. Bana, B. & McCourt, W. (2006) Institutions and governance: Public staff management in Tanzania, Public Administration and Development 26: 395-407.

  3. Bangura, Y. & Larbi, G. (eds.) (2004) Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. Palgrave/Macmillan.

  4. Batley, (2004), ‘The Politics of Service Delivery Reform’, Development and Change, Volume 35 No. 1, January, pp.31

  5. Batley, & Larbi, G. (2004) The Changing Role of Government: The reform of public services in developing countries, Houndmills and New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

  6. Batley, & Larbi, G. (2006) Capacity to Deliver? Management, Institutions and Public Services in Developing Countries, in Larbi, G. & Bangura, Y. (2006) Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. Geneva: UNRISD

  7. Berg, E. (2000) Aid and failed reforms: the case of public sector management, in Tarp, F. (ed.) Foreign aid and development: lessons learnt and directions for the future. London: Routledge, pp. 290-311.

  8. Bogdanor, (2002) Delivering, not thinking: politically sensitive government agenices should not be run like private-sector companies, Financial Times 1 August.

  9. Bogumil, J, Kuhlmann, & Grohs, S. (2008) Evaluating administrative modernization in Germany local governments: success or failure of the ‘New Steering Model’? Public Admnistration Review (forthcoming)

  10. Brautigam, D. (2000) Aid dependence and governance. EGDI Study 2000:1. Stockholm: Almkvist & Wiksell International.

  11. Caulfield, (2002) Executive agencies in Tanzania: liberalization and third world debt, Public Administration and Development 22(3):209-20.

  12. Chabal, P. & Daloz, J. (1999) Africa works: disorder as political instrument. London: James Curry.

  13. Chan, S. (1987) Comparative performance of East Asian and Latin American NICs, Pacific Focus 2(1); 35-56.

  14. Chang, H. (1993) The political economy of industrial policy in Korea, Cambridge Journal of Economics 17(2).

  15. Chang, H. (2002) Kicking away the ladder: economic development in historical perspective. Anthem.

  16. Chang, H. (2003) Globalisation, economic development and the role of the State. Zed Press (HD87) WL

  17. Chang, H. (2007) The East Asian development experience. Zed Press.

  18. Chang, (ed.) (2007) Institutional change and economic development. Helsinki: UNU- WIDER.

  19. Chang, S. (2006) An institutional analysis of performance management systems of executive agencies: the case of Korea. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, International Development Department (Doctoral thesis).

  20. Cheung, A. & Scott, I. (eds.) (2003) Governance and public sector reform in Asia: paradigm shifts or business as usual? London & New York: RoutledgeCurzon.

  21. Coulson, (ed.) (1998) Trust and contracts: relationships in local government, health and the public services. London: Policy Press.

  22. Crook, & Manor, J. (1998) Democracy and decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa: participation, accountability and performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  23. Deyo, F. (1987) The political economy of the new Asian industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University

  24. Du Gay, P. (2000) In praise of bureaucracy. London: Sage.

  25. Echebarría, K. & Cortázar, J. (2007) Public administration and public employment reform in Latin America. In: Lora, E. (ed.) (2007) The state of state reform in Latin America. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank, pp. 123-155.

  26. European Commission (2006) Thematic Evaluation of the EC Support to Good Governance. Brussels: European Commission.

  27. Evans, (1995) Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  28. Evans, & Krauch, J. (1999) Bureaucracy and growth: a cross-national analysis of the effects of ‘Weberian’ state structures on economic growth, American Sociological Review 64(4): 748-65.

  29. Ferlie, E. et al. (1996) The new public management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  30. Fritz, V. & Rocha, A. (2006) (Re)building developmental states: From theory to practice. London: Overseas Development Institute, Working Paper 274.

  31. Fritz, & Rocha, A. (2007) Developmental states in the new millennium: concepts and challenges for a new aid agenda, Development Policy Review, 25 (5): 531-552.

  32. Haggard, S. (1990) Pathways from the periphery: the politics of growth in the newly industrialising countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  33. Harris, C. et al. (2003) Infrastructure projects: a review of canceled private projects. Washington: Public Policy for the Private Sector, Note No. 252, Private Sector and Infrastructure Network, World Bank.

  34. Henderson, et al. (2002) Economic governance and poverty reduction in South Korea. London: DFID Globalisation and Poverty Programme.

  35. Henderson, J. et al (2007) Bureaucratic effects: Weberian state agencies and poverty reduction, Sociology 41(3): 515-532.

  36. Hood, (1991) A public management for all seasons, Public Administration 69(1): 3- 19.

  37. Hope, K. (2002) The new public management: a perspective from Africa, in McLaughlin, K. et al (eds.) New public management: current trends and future prospects. London: Routledge.

  38. Hubbard, M (2002), Managing the Liberalisation of Agricultural Markets in Developing Countries.

  39. Jackson, P (2002) Business Development in Asia and Africa.

  40. Johnson, C. (1995) Japan: who governs? The rise of the developmental state. NY.

  41. Jones, D. (2002) Recent reforms in Singapore’s administrative elite: responding to the challenges of rapidly changing economy and society, Asian Journal of Political Science 10(2):70-93.

  42. Khan, M. (2006) Governance, economic growth and development since the 1960s: background paper for the World Economic and Social Survey New York: UNDESA.

  43. KIggundu, M. (2002) Bureaucracy and administrative reform in developing countries: In Kirkpatrick, C. et al. (eds.) Handbook on development policy and management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.291-302.

  44. Knack, & Rahmann, A. (2004) Donor fragmentation and bureaucratic quality in aid recipients. Washington: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3186.

  45. Laking, R. (1999) Don’t try this at home: A New Zealand approach to public management reform in Mongolia, International Public Management Journal 2(2):217- 35.

  46. Larbi, G. (1995) Implications and impact of structural adjustment on the civil service: the case of Ghana. Birmingham: Role of Government in Adjusting Economies, Paper No. 2. Development Administration Group (ex-IDD), University of Birmingham.

  47. Larbi, G. (1999) Institutional constraints and capacity issues in decentralising management in public services: the case of health in Ghana, Journal of International Development 10:377-86.

  48. Leith, J. (2005) Why Botswana prospered. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

  49. Levy, B. & Kpundeh, S. (eds.) (2004) Building state capacity in Africa: new approaches, emerging lessons. Washington DC: World Bank.

  50. Loriaux, M. (1999) The French developmental stateas myth and moral ambition, in Woo-Cummings, M. (ed.) (1999) The developmental state. Cornell Studies in Political Economy, pp.235-275.

  51. Malloy, (ed.) (1977) Authoritarianism and corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

  52. Manning, N. (2000) The new public management in developing countries. In: Kirkpatrick, C. et al. (eds.) Handbook on development policy and management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.303-314.

  53. Masina, P. (2005) Vietnam’s development strategies. London: Routledge Curzon.

  54. W. & Minogue, M. (eds.) (2001) The internationalisation of public management: reinventing the third world state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  55. McLaughlin, K et al. (eds.) (2002) New public management: current trends and future prospects. London: Routledge.

  56. Minogue, M. et al. (1998) Beyond the new public management: changing ideas and practices in governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  57. Moss, T. et al. (2006) A review essay on aid dependency and state building in Sub- Saharan Africa: an aid-institutions paradox? Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, Working Paper No. 74.

  58. Nickson, (2008) Local Governance in Latin America, Paper delivered at International Political Science Association (IPSA) Workshop on Local Governance in comparative perspective, Winelands Conference, Stellenbosch University, South Africa (April).

  59. Nunberg, B. (1997) Rethinking civil service reform: an agenda for smart government. Washington DC: World Bank Poverty and Social Development Department.

  60. Olsen, J. (2006) Maybe Its Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 1-24.

  61. Philip, G. (2003) Ideas and policy transfer: the Mexican civil service reform. London: ESRC Research Programme on Future Governance Paper 13.

  62. Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2004) Public management reform: a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2nd

  63. Pollitt, C. & Talbot, C. (2004) Unbundled government: a critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualisation. London & New York: Routledge/ Taylor & Francis

  64. PPI (2007) PPI in developing countries in 2006: results from PPI project database. Washington: Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF), World Bank.

  65. Quah, (2003) Public administration in Singapore: the role of the public bureaucracy in a one-party dominant system, in Tummala, K. (ed.) Comparative bureaucratic systems. Lexington MA: Lexington Books, pp. 165-83.

  66. Prud’homme, R. (1995) The Dangers of Decentralization, World Bank Research Observer 10(2): 201-20.

  67. Randall, V. (2007) Political parties and democratic developmental states, Development Policy Review 25(5): 633-652.

  68. Rondinelli, (1981) Government decentralization in comparative perspective: theory and practice in developing countries, International Review of Administrative Sciences 47(2):133-145.

  69. Sarker, A. (2006) New public management in developing countries: an analysis of success and failure with particular reference to Singapore and Bangla Desh, International Journal of Public Sector Management 19(2):180-203.

  70. Schick, A. (1996) The Spirit of Reform: Managing the New Zealand State Sector in a Time of Change. Wellington: State Services Commission.

  71. Schick, A. (1999) Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand reforms, World Bank Research Observer 13(1): 123-31.

  72. Shepherd (2003) Civil service reform in developing countries: Why is it going badly? UNPAN.

  73. Sindzingre, A. (2007) Financing the developmental state: tax and revenue issues, Development Policy Review 25(5):615-632.

  74. SKF/SCB (2004) Vad kostar verksamheten I Din kommun? Stockholm:Svenska Kommunförbundet/Statistika Centralbyrån, Bokslut 2003.

  75. Sutton, (2003) Governance, public sector reform and the New Public Management.: the Commonwealth Caribbean experience. London: ESRC Research Programme on Future Governance Paper 14.

  76. Talbot, C. & Caulfield, J. (eds.) (2002) Hard agencies in soft states: a study of agency creation programmes in Jamaica, Latvia and Tanzania. University of Glamorgan & DFID.

  77. Prinsen, G. & Titeca, K., (2008) Uganda’s decentralised primary education: musical chairs and inverted elite capture in school management committees, Public Administration and Development 28:149-164.

  78. Verheijen, T. (2001a) Politico administrative relations: who rules? NISPAcee

  79. Verheijen, T. (2001b) Government in Central Asia: tendencies, achievements and failures, Local Government Brief, Summer issue. Budapest: Open Society Institute.

  80. Villarroel, (2005) Servicio civil y escalafón híbrido para puestos jerárquicos. La Paz, Bolivia: Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional.

  81. Wade, (1990) Governing the market: economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialisation. Princeton University Press.

  82. Walsh, K. (1995) Public services and market mechanisms.

  83. Wettenhall, & Thynne, I. (2002) Public enterprise and privatization in a new century: evolving patterns of governance and public management, Public Finance and Management, 2:1-24.

  84. Westcott, C. (2004) Improving public administration in the Asia-Pacific region: some lessons from experience, International Public Administration Review 5(2):78-102

  85. Woo-Cummings, M. (ed.) (1999) The developmental state. Cornell Studies in Political Economy.

  86. World Bank (1997) The State in a changing world: World Development Report 1997. New York: Oxford University Press.

  87. World Bank (1999) Civil service reform: a review of World Bank assistance. Washington DC: World Bank.

  88. World Bank (2004) Making Service work for poor people: World Development Report 2004. New York: Oxford University Press.

  89. World Bank (2005) Capacity Building in Africa: An OED Evaluation of World Bank Support. Washington DC: World Bank.

  90. World Bank (2006) Public Sector Reform Evaluation: Approach Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Поступила в редакцию 2019-04-19
Опубликована 2019-06-18
Раздел
Политология. Международные отношения
Страницы
232-246