ГОЛОФРАЗА В ПРОТОЯЗЫКЕ - СЕМАНТИКА И МОРФОЛОГИЯ

  • Анатолий Евсеевич Зельдин
    • Управление Государственной Службы
Ключевые слова: голофраза, протоязык, эволюция языка, прото-лексема, метафорический перенос

Аннотация

Фонетическая и семантическая реконструкция лексем считается надежной только в рамках сравнительно-исторического метода. Отдельные попытки восстановления корней человеческого языка на самой ранней его стадии (что в десятки раз превышает диахроническую глубину сравнительно-исторического метода) считаются бездоказательными и спекулятивными. Тем не менее, автор берет в качестве модели онтогенез детской речи применительно к метафорическому переносу трех-четырех лексем и делает вывод о большой вероятности аналогичного перехода в филогенезе человеческой речи. Приводятся данные о значительной диахронической устойчивости рассматриваемого просодического контура ma-(-ma). Выводы подкрепляются большим количеством примеров из современных языков с примерами лексем соответствующей семантики, которые по всей вероятности сохранили примордиальний фонетический контур. Предполагается, что протолексема с семантикой «есть», «еда» носила характер голофразы.

Литература

1. Василевич Г. Эвенкийско-русский словарь. M.: Гос. изд-во иностр. и национ. словарей, 1958.
2. Вежбицкая А. Семантические универсалии и описание языков. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1999.
3. Гвоздев А.Н. От первых слов до первого класса. Дневник научных наблюдений. Саратов: Изд-во Саратовского ун-та, 1981.
4. Зализняк А.А. Семантический переход как объект типологии // Вопросы языкознания. 2013. Вып. 2. С. 32-51.
5. Зельдин А. Панконтинентальные лексемы - диахроническая реальность или ignotum per ignotius? // Вопросы гуманитарных наук. 2014. Вып. 6. С. 52-63.
6. Зельдин А. Manum de tabula или парадоксы эволюционирования семантики // Вопросы гуманитарных наук. 2015. Вып. 2. С. 64-91.
7. Зельдин А. Нейролингвистический базис образования метафоры // Актуальные проблемы современной науки. 2016 а. Вып. 3. С. 185-191.
8. Зельдин А. Роль метафоры в построении базового лексикона // Актуальные проблемы современной науки. 2016 b. Вып. 5. С. 101-118.
9. Зельдин А. О роли метафоры в построении семантического поля // Актуальные проблемы современной науки. 2017. Вып. 4. С. 138-159.
10. Зельдин А. Звуковой символ «мама» в синхроническом и диахроническом аспекте // Вопросы психолингвистики. 2018. Т. 4. Вып. 38. С. 120-136.
11. Зельдин А. Метафора как производное гештальта: психологический и лингвистический аспект // In press.
12. Климов Г.Ф. Этимологический словарь картвельских языков // 1964. М., изд. АН СССР. 307 с.
13. Потебня А.А. Мысль и язык // 1999. М., Лабиринт. 203 с.
14. Смирницкая А.А. Cinnappān и uncle: семантическое развитие в дравидийской и индоевропейской терминологии родства // Труды Института востоковедения РАН. 2018. Вып. 6. Проблемы общей и востоковедной лингвистики. Языки Южной и Юго-Восточной Азии. М. С. 74-91.
15. Успенский Л. Слово о словах. Л., Детгиз, 1954. 296 с.
16. Цейтлин С. Очерки по словообразованию и формообразованию в детской речи // Studia philologica. М.: Знак, 2009. 592 с.
17. Aikio A. Proto-Uralic // The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages. Bakró-Nagy. M., Laakso J.& Skribnik E. (eds.). Oxford University Press. 2022. Pp. 3- 27.
18. 18.Aitchison J. The seeds of speech. Language origin and evolution // Cambridge University Press. 1996. 281 p.
19. Alhadji Adamu M., Babayo Garba Potiskum U. Ngizim-English-Hausa Dictionary // Schuh R. (ed.). Yobe Languages Research Project. Schuh R. Potiskum, Yobe State. 2009. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/6918378/ngizim-english-hausa-dictionary-ucla
20. Alpher B. Yir-Yoront Lexicon. Sketchand Dictionaryofan Australian Language // Berlin, Moutonde Gruyter. 1991. 795 p.
21. Arbib M.Themirrorsystem, imitationandevolutionoflanguage // Imitation in Animals Artifacts. Chrystopher Nehaniv Ch.& Dautenhahn K.(eds). The MIT Press. 2002. Pp. 229-280.
22. Armstrong R. The Study of West African Languages // The Institute of African Studies, Ibadan University Press. 1964. 86 p.
23. Bancel P., Mattey de l’Etang A. Brave New Words // New Perspectivein the Originsof Language. Studiesin Language Companion Series, #144. Lefebvre C., Comrie B., Cohen H. (eds). John Benjamin Publ. Comp. 2013. Pp. 333-377.
24. Bancel P., Matthey de l’Etang A. Tracing the Ancestral Kinship System: The Global Etymon KAKA. Part I: A linguistic study // Mother Tongue. 2002.Vol. 7. Pp. 209-43.
25. Bateman W.G. Papers on Linguistic Development // The Pedagogical Seminary. 1917. Vol. 24. No. 3. Pp. 391-398.
26. Beaudet A. The Emergence of Language in the Hominine Lineage: Perspectives from Fossil Endocasts // Front. Hum. Neurosc. 2017. Vol. 11. P. 427.
27. Bellwood P. Austronesian Prehistory in Southeast Asia Homeland. Expansion and Transformation // The Austronesians: Historical and comparative perspectives. Bellwood P., Fox J. Tryon D. (eds.), Australian National University, Department of Anthropology. 1995. Pp. 103 - 118.
28. Bender L. Are global etymologies valid? // General Linguistics. 1993. Vol. 33. Pp. 191-219.
29. Bengston J. On Fossil Dinosaurs and Fossil Words // Linguistic Fossils: Studies in Historical Linguistics and Paleolinguistics. Language in Time and Space, Vol. 5. Drover Davidson C. (ed.). 2010. Calgary, Octavia and Co. 236 p.
30. Bengston J., Ruhlen M. Global Etymologies // Ruhlen M. On the Origin of Languages: Studies in Linguistic Taxonomy. Stanford, Stanford University Press. 1994.Pp. 277-336.
31. Beyer R., Krapp M., Eriksson A., Manica A. Climatic windows for human migration out of Africa in the past 300,000 years // Nature Communications. 2021.Vol. 12. P. 4889.
32. Bickerton D. Language & Species // Chicago - L., University of Chicago Press. 1990. 297 p.
33. Blasi D., Wichmann S., Hammarström H., Stadler P., Christiansen M. Sound-meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages // PNAS. 2016.V.113. No. 39. Pp. 10818-10823.
34. Blench R. The problem of pan-African roots // In Hot Pursuit of Language in Prehistory. Essays in the four fields of anthropology. Bengston J. (ed.). Amsterdam-Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Comp. 2008. Pp. 189-212.
35. Bolhuis J., Tattersall I., Chomsky N., Berwick R. How Could Language Have Evolved? // PLoS Biol. 2014. V.12. No. 8. P. e10011934.
36. Bomhard A. Afrasian Comparative Phonology and Vocabulary // Charleston, SC. 2014. 385 p.
37. Burunat E. Language Genesis // Advances in Anthropology. 2015. Vol. 5. Pp. 86-115.
38. Byrne R., Whiten A. Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in mokeys, apes and humans // Oxford, Oxford University Press.1988. 430 p.
39. Calvin W., Bickerton D. Lingua Ex Machina: Reconciling Darwin with the Human Brain // Cambridge MA: MIT Press. 2000. 304 p.
40. Campbell L. American Indian Languages. The Historical Linguistics of Native Americans // Oxford University Press. 1997. 526 p.
41. Campbell L. What can we learn about the earliest human languages by comparing languages known today? // Origin and Evolution of Languages. Approaches, Models, Paradigm. Laks B. (ed.), Exuinox, 2008. Pp. 79-111.
42. Clark E. What’s in a Word? On the Child’s Acquisition of Semantics in His First language // Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. Moore T. (ed.). NY-L, Academic Press. 1973. Pp. 65-110.
43. Collinder B. An Introduction to the Uralic Languages // Berkeley - LA. University of California Press. 1965. 187 p.
44. Comrie B. Introduction // The World Major Languages. Comrie B. (ed.), Oxford University Press, 1987. Pp. 1-22.
45. Corballis M. The Evolution of Language. The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience // Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2009. Vol. 1156. Pp. 19-43.
46. Coulson S. Metaphor Comprehension and the Brain: Empirical Studies // The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Gibbs R. (ed.). Cambridge - NY, Cambridge University Press. 2008. Pp. 177-194.
47. Creissels D. Sound Correspondences between Proto-Bantu and Tswana // Bantu Historical Linguistics, Hombert J.-M. & Hyman L.M. (eds.). Stanford CA. CSLI Publ. 1999.Pp 297-334.
48. Crystal D. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language // Cambridge University Press. 1987. 472 p.
49. Daujeard C., Falguères Ch., Shao Q., Geraads D., Hublin J.-J., et al. (15 names in total). Earliest African evidence of carcass processing and consumption in cave at 700 ka., Casablanca, Morocco // Nature. Scientific Reports. 2020. Vol. 10. P. 4761.
50. Dediu D., Levinson S. On the antiquity of language: the reinterpretation of Neanderthal linguistic capacities and its consequences // Frontiers in Psychology. 2013. V.4. No. 397. Pp.1-17.
51. de Lafuente V., Romo R. Language Abilities of Motor Cortex // Neuron. 2004.V.41. No. 2. Pp. 178-180.
52. Davis B., McNeilage P. The frame/content theory of speech evolution: from lip smacks to syllables // Primatologie. 2004. Vol. 6. Pp. 305-328.
53. Deutscher G. The Unfolding of Language. The Evolution of Mankind’s Greatest Invention // Arrow Books. 2006. 360 p.
54. Domínguez-Rodrigo M., Pickering T., Semaw S., Rogers M. 2005. Cutmarked bones from Pliocene archaeological sites at Gona Afar, Ethiopia: implications for the function of the world’s oldest stone tools // J Hun Evol. 2005. Vol. 48. No. 2. Pp. 109-121.
55. Dunbar R. Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language // L.-Boston. Faber & Faber. 1996. 230 p.
56. Falk D. 2004. Prelinguistic evolution in early hominins: Whence motherese? // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2004. Vol. 27. Pp. 491-541.
57. Frank-Wilson M. Nuer Field Notes //https://dlib.indiana.edu/collections/nuer/2003.
58. Fortescue M. Comparative Chukotko-Kamchatkan Dictionary // Berlin - NY, Mouton de Gruyter. 2005. 496 p.
59. Gentilucci M., Benuzzi F., Gangitano M., Grimaldi S. Grasp with Hand and Mouth: a Kinematic Study on Healthy Subjects // J. Neurophysiol. 2001. Vol. 86. Pp. 1685-1699.
60. Glass R. Nasal Consonants and Nasalized Vowels: an Acoustic Study and Recognition Experiments //MA Dissertation. Massachusets Institute of Technology. 1982.
61. Goddard C. 1994. Semantic Theory and Semantic Universals // Semantic and Lexical Universals. Theory and Empirical Findings. Goddard C., Wierzbicka A. (eds.). Amsterdan-Philadelphia, John Benjamins 1994. Pp. 7-29.
62. Goldman H. Parental reports of “MAMA” sounds in infants: An exploratory study // Journal of Child Language. 2001. Vol. 28. Pp. 467-506.
63. Greenberg S. A syllabic-centre framework for the evolution of spoken language // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1998. Vol. 21. Pp. 518.
64. Greenfield P. Language, tool and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1991. Vol. 14. pp. 531-595.
65. Greenlee M., Ohala J. Phonetically Motivated Parallels between Child Phonology and Historical Sound Change // Language Sciences. 1980.Vol. 2. No. 2. pp. 283-308.
66. Guthrie M. Guthrie’s Proto-Bantu forms //http://www.cbold.ddl.cnrs.fr/Docs/Guthrie.html ND
67. Hagège C. Linguistic Universals as General Tendencies // Hattori Sh.& Inoue K. (eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists. August 29th - September 4th 1982, Tokyo. Tokyo Press. 1983. Pp. 936-940.
68. Hewson J. Proto-Algonquin Dictionary // protoalgonquian.atlas-ling.ca/#!/help 2023.
69. Hurford J. Linguistics from an Evolutionary Point of View // Philosophy of Linguistics. Kempson R., Fernando T., Asher No. (eds.). Boston, North Holland. 2012. Pp. 473-498.
70. Jackendoff R., Pinker S. The nature of language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser and Chomsky) // Cognition. 2005. Vol. 67. Pp. 211-225.
71. Jakobson R. Why ‘Mama’ and ‘Papa’? // Perspectives in Psychological Theory: Essays in Honour of Heinz Werner. Kaplan B., Wapner S. (eds.). NY. International University Press. 1960. Pp.124-134.
72. Jakobson R., Halle M. Fundamentals of Language // Gravenhage. 1956. 87 p.
73. Jespersen O. Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin // L. George Allen&Unwin. 1922. 448 p.
74. Kaufman T. A Preliminary Mayan Etymological Dictionary// http://www.famsi.org/reports/01051/pmed.pdf 2003.
75. Kirkham S., Nance C. Diachronic phonological assymetries and the variable stability of synchronic contrast // Journal of Phonetics. 2022. Vol. 94. P.101176.
76. Krishnamurti Bh. The Dravidian Languages // Cambridge MA, Cambridge University Press. 2003. 545 p. (In English).
77. Kun Y., Jinqiu G., Xu W. Eating we live by. Eating metaphors in Mandarin Chinese // Cognitive Linguistic Studies. 2021. Vol. 8. N.1. Pp. 204-233.
78. Lakoff G. The Neural Theory of Metaphor // The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Gibbs R. (ed.), Cambridge - NY. Cambridge University Press 2008.Pp. 17-38.
79. LaPolla R. Nominalization in Rawang // Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area. 2008. Vol. 31. No. 2. Pp.45-65. (In English).
80. LeClaire N., Cardinal G., Cardinal H., Hunter E., Waugh E. Alberta Elders’ Cree Dictionary // Edmonton, Alberta. University of Alberta Press. Duval House Publishing. 2006. 577 p.
81. Lieberman Ph. On the Origins of Language // McMillan. 1975. 196 p.
82. Lieberman Ph. On the Nature and Evolution of the Neural Bases of Human Language // Yearbook of Physical Anthropology. 2002. Vol. 45. Pp. 36-62.
83. Lieberman Ph. The evolution of human speech // Current Anthropology. 2007. Vol. 48. Pp. 39-46.
84. Lieberman Ph., Crelin E. On the Speech of Neanderthal Man // Linguistic Inquiry. 1971. Vol. 2 N.2. Pp. 203-222.
85. Locke J. Phases in the Child’s Development of Language // American Scientist. 1994. Vol. 82. Pp. 436-445.
86. Locke J., Bogin B. Language and life history: A new perspective on the development and evolution of human language // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2006. Vol. 29. Pp. 259-325.
87. MacNeilage P. Linguistic and manual evolution // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1991. Vol. 14. Pp. 568-570.
88. MacNeilage P. 1998. The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1998. Vol. 21. Pp. 499-546.
89. MacNeilage P, Davis B. On the Origin of Internal Structure of Word Forms // Science. 2000. Vol. 288. Pp. 527-531.
90. MacNeilage P., Davis B., Kinney A., Matyear C. The motor core of speech: a comparison of serial organization patterns in infants and languages // Child Development. 2000. Vol. 71. Pp. 153-163.
91. Maslow A.A Theory of Human Motivation // Psychological Review. 1943.Vol. 50. N.4. Pp. 370-396.
92. Matteson E. Toward Proto-Amerindian // Comparative Studies in American Languages. Matteson E. (ed.). Mouton. 1972. Pp. 21 -92.
93. McMahon A., McMahon R. Evolutionary Linguistics // Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics series. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 2012. 309 p.
94. McManus I. Handedness, cerebral lateralization and the evolution of language // The descent of mind: Psychological perspectives on hominid evolution. Corballis M. & Lea S. (eds.). Oxford, Oxford University Press. 1999.Pp. 194-217.
95. McQuown No. The Indigenous Languages of Latin America // American Anthropologist. 1955. Vol. 57. No. 3. Pp. 501-570.
96. Mellars P. Why did modern human populations disperse from Africa ca. 60,000 years ago? A new model // PNAS. 2006. Vol. 103. No. 25. Pp. 9381-9386.
97. Miller G. The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature // Anchor Books. 2001.
98. Mortensen D. Comparative Tanghul // https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dmortens/assets/pdf/mortensen2003comparative.pdf 2003
99. Mukarovsky H.A Study of Western Nigritic.Volume I //Institut für Ägyptologie und Afrikanistik, Universität Wien.1977. 258 p.
100. Murdock G.P. Cross-language Parralels in Parental Kin Terms // Anthropological Linguistics. 1959.V.1. Pp. 1-5.
101. Nichols J. Modeling Ancient Population Structures and Movement in Linguistics // Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 1997. Vol. 26. Pp. 359-384.
102. Ohala J. Content first, frame later // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1998. Vol. 21. Pp. 525-526.
103. Osmond M. Fish // The Lexicon of Proto-Oceanic. The Culture and Environment of Ancestral Oceanic Society. 4: Animals. Ross M., Pawley A., Osmond M. (eds.). Pacific Linguistic School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and Pacific. The Australian National University. 2011. 602 p.
104. Pagel M., Atkinson Q., Meade A. Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history // Nature. 2007. Vol. 449. Pp. 717-720.
105. Parent Co. “Why “Mama” Has the Same Meaning in Almost Every Language // parent.com/blogs/conversations/mama-is-most-universal-word. May 06 2016 (12.09.2023)
106. Parker S., Gibson K. A developmental model for the evolution of language and intelligence in early hominids // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1979.Vol. 2. Pp. 367-408.
107. Passmore S., Barth W., Greenhill S. et al. (24 names in total). Kinbank: A global database of kinship terminology // PLoS ONE. 2023. Vol. 18. No. 5. Pp. e0283218.
108. Pawley A., Ross M. The Prehistory of Oceanic Languages: A Current View // The Austronesians: Historical and Comparative Perpectives. Bellwood P., Fox. Fox J., Tryon D. (eds.). Australian National University, Department of Anthropology. 1995. Pp. 43-80.
109. Piaget J. The language and thought of the child // NY, Meridian. 1955. 254 p.
110. Pokorný J. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörtebuch // Bern. 1959. 770 p.
111. Povinelli D. Reconstructing the Evolution of Mind // American Psychologist. 1993. Vol. 48. No. 5. Pp. 493-509.
112. Quillier P. Dramaturgies de vertige: l’origine de langage // Collegium Budapest Workshop Series. Institute for Advanced Study. Workshop Series # 2. Trabant J. (ed.). 1996.Pp. 155-219.
113. Read D. From Pan to Homo sapiens: evolution from individual based to group based forms of social cognition // Mind & Society. 2020. Vol. 19. Pp. 121-161.
114. Rédei K. Uralisches Etymologisches Wörtebuch. Band I. Uralische und finnish-ugrische Schicht // Wiesbaden, Otto Harrassowitz. 1988. 593 p.
115. Reid L. The Current Status of Austric: a review and evolution of lexical and morphosyntactic evidence // The peopling of East Asia. Sagart L., Blench R, Sanchez-Mazas A. (eds.). L-NY, Routlege, 2004. Pp.132-160.
116. Reinmuth J.-Ch. La mere, le sein, la tétée, l’amour et le baiser: une analyse diachronique en soutien des theories de l’énaction et de l’incarnation // Signifiances (Signifying). 2017. Vol. 1. No. 3. Pp. 133-149.
117. Reynolds P.C. Ape constructional ability and the origin of linguistic structure // Grolier E. (ed.), Glossogenetics: The Origin and Evolution of Language. NY- P, Harwood Academic Publishers 1983. Pp. 185-200. (In English).
118. Ridley Ch. Mum and Me: A Comparative Phonological Study of Maternal Nursery Terms and First Person Object Designators // MA Thesis. University of Central Lankashire. 2018. 103 p. (In English).
119. Rivera A., Rivera S. 2019. Mechanisms of Cognitive Evolution of Genus Homo // Ludus Vitalis. 2019. Vol. 27. No. 51. Pp. 1-22.
120. Rizzolatti G., Arbib M. 1998. Language within our grasp // Trends in Neuroscience. 1998. Vol. 21. No. 5. Pp. 188-194.
121. Schreyer Ch. A Proto-Human Language: Fact or Fiction? // Totem: the University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology. 2002. Vol. 10. N.1. Pp. 53-61.
122. Schrock T. A grammar of Ik (Icé-tód), Northeast Uganda’s last thriving Kuliak language // PhD Dissertation, University of Leiden. 2014. 747 p.
123. Scollon R. Conversations with a one year old: A case study of the developmental foundations of syntax // Honolulu, University Press of Hawaii. 1976. 252 p.
124. Shipton C. Imitation and Shared Intentionality in the Acheulean // Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2010. Vol. 20. No. 2. Pp. 197-210.
125. Starostin S., Dybo A., Mudrak O. Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages // Leiden, Brill. 2003. 1556 p.
126. Starostin S., Starostin G. The Tower of Babel.An Etymological Database Project // https://starlingdb.org/ 1998/2023.
127. Stewart J. Pre-Bantu Nasal Vowel Creation // Bantu Historical Linguistics. Hombert J.-M. & Hyman L.M. (eds.). Stanford CA, CSLI Publ. 1999. Pp. 207-234.
128. Stout D., Toth N., Schick K., Chaminade Th. Neural correlates of early Stone Age toolmaking: technology, language and cognition in human evolution // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 2008. Vol. 363. Pp. 1939-1949.
129. Studdert-Kennedy M., GoldsteinL. Launching language: the gestural origin of discrete infinity // Language evolution. Christiansen M., Kirby S.(eds.). Oxford. Oxford University Press. 2003. Pp. 235-254.
130. Swadesh M. The Origin and Diversification of Language //Chicago, Aldine-Atherton. 1971. 350 p.
131. Szemerényi O. Studies in the Indo-European Systems of Numerals // Heidelberg. Carl Winter. Universitätsverlag. 1960. 204 p.
132. Tincoff R., Jusczyk P. Some beginnings of word comprehension of word comprehension in six-month-olds // Psychological Science. 1999. Vol. 10. Pp. 172-175.
133. Trusk L. Where do mama/papa words come from? // University of Sussex Working Papers in Linguistics and English Language. https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=where-do-mama2.pdf&site=12004.
134. Ullman S. Semantic Universals // Universals of Language. Greenberg J. (ed.). MIT Press. 1951. Pp. 217-255.
135. Wichmann S., Holman E., Brown C. Sound Symbolosm in Basic Vocabulary // Enthropy. 2010. Vol. 12. Pp. 844-858.
136. Wierzbicka A. All people eat and drink. Does this mean that ‘eat’ and ‘drink’ are universal human concepts? // The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking. Newman J. (ed.). Amsterdam - Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company. 2009. Pp. 65-90.
137. Wierzbicka A. Back to ‘Mother’ and ‘Father’. Overcoming the Eurocentrism of Kinship Studies through Eight Lexical Universals // Current Anthropology. 2016. Vol. 57. No. 4. Pp.408-429.
138. Vihman M., Macken M., Miller R., Simmons H., Miller J. From Babbling to Speech: a Reassessment of the Continuity Issue // Language. 1985. Vol. 61. No. 2. Pp. 397-445.
139. Williams H.A Dictionary of the Maori Language // Wellington. Government Printer. 1957. 499 p.
140. Wolpert L. Casual beliefs lead to toolmaking which require handedness for motor control // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2003. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 242.
141. Wrangham R, Jones J., Laden G., Pilbeam D., Conklin-Brittain No. The raw and the stolen. Cooking and the ecology of human origins // Current Anthropology. 1999. Vol. 40. No. 5. Pp. 567-594.
142. Wrangham R. Catching Fire. How Cooking Made Us Human // L. Profile Books. 2009. 309 p.
143. Wray A. Protolanguage as a holistic system for social interaction // Language and Communication. 1998. Vol. 18. Pp. 47-67.
144. Wray A. Holistic utterances in protolanguage: the link from primates to humans // The evolutionary emergence of language: social function and the origins of linguistic form. Knight Ch., Studdert-Kennedy M., Hurford J. (eds.). Cambridge.Cambridge University Press. 2000. Pp. 285-302.
Поступила в редакцию 2024-01-17
Опубликована 2024-04-27
Раздел
Лингвистика
Страницы
247-269