ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ ТУРЦИИ КАК СТРАНы-КАНДИДАТА В ЧЛЕНЫ ЕС С УЧЕТОМ СОЗДАНИЯ ГИПЕРГРАЖДАНСКОГО ЕВРОПЕЙСКОГО СОЮЗА (на англ. яз.)

  • Андреа Питаси
    • Университет Аннунцио
  • Сара Петрочча
    • Университет Аннунцио
  • Камила Джованна Портолезе
    • Лейденский университет
  • Дьёрдь Чепели
    • Будапештский университет
Ключевые слова: Турция, Европейский союз, формирование политики, ГиперГражданство, руководящие принципы

Аннотация

Данное исследование посвящено стратегическому, геополитическому, правовому и экономическому анализу плюсов и минусов потенциального вступления Турции в Европейский Союз. В работе исследуется политический аспект вопроса и в первую очередь процесс формирования политики. В начале статьи содержится анализ текущего состояния дел, после чего авторы переходят к вопросу о необходимости структурных связей между Турцией и Европейским Союзом, и далее размышляют о возможном расширении Евросоюза на восток с его плюсами и минусами.

Литература

1. Audretsch D. (2007), The Entrepreneurial Society. Oxford University Press., Oxford.
2. Beck, U. (1998), World Risk Society. Polity Press, Cambridge.
3. Beck U. (2006), The Cosmopolitan Vision. Polity Press, Cambridge.
4. Boatcă M., Gutiérrez Rodríguez E., Costa S. (2016), Decolonizing European Sociology. Transdisciplinary Approaches. London, Routldedge.
5. Constable S. Wright R.E. (2011), Guide to the 50 Economic Indicators That Really Matter. Harper Business, New York.
6. Donati P. (1993), La cittadinanza societaria. Laterza, Roma-Bari.
7. Donati P. (2010), Relational Sociology. Routledge, London.
8. Dawkins R. (1976), The Selfish Gene., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Gombrich E. (1985), Custodi della memoria. Feltrinelli, Milan.
10. Harris J. (2007), Enhancing Evolution., Princeton University Press, Princeton.
11. Heidegger M. (1933), ‘The Self-Assertation of the German University’ in Neske G. and Kettering E. (eds.), Martin Heidegger and National Socialism, Paragon House, New York, 1990, pP. 5-13.
12. Huntington S. (1996), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order.Touchstone, New York.
13. Lowi T. J. (2009), Arenas of Power, Reflections on Politics and Policy. Routledge, London
14. Luhmann N. (1988), ‘Warum AGIL?’, in Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 40, 127-139.
15. Luhmann N. (1989), Ecological Communication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
16. Luhmann N. (1990), Essays on Self Reference. New York, Columbia University Press.
17. Luhmann N. (1995), Social Systems. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
18. Luhmann N. (1997), Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.
19. Luhmann N. (2010), Soziologische Aufklaerung. Opladen, WestdeutscherVerlag.
20. Kaufmann S. (2000), Investigations. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
21. Kedourie, E. (1993), Nationalism. Fourth, expanded edition., Blackwell, Oxford.
22. Malthus T. R. (2004), An essay on the Principle of Population. W.W. Norton, New York-London.
23. Neves M. (2009), Transconstitucionalismo. WMF Martins Fontes, São Paulo
24. Nowotny H. (2008), Insatiable Curiosity-Innovation in a Fragile Future. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
25. Ortega y Gasset J. (1963), Man and People. Norton, New York.
26. Paolone G. and Pitasi A. (2013), Comparing Systemic Business Paradigms, Chance, Complexity, Communication and Evolutionary Strategies. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken.
27. Pearce F. (2010), The On Coming Population Crash. Beacon Press, Boston.
28. Pinker S. (2018), Enlightenment Now, The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. Penguin Group, UK.
29. Petroccia S, (2020) with Pitasi A., Portolese G. , Csepeli G. The Case of Turkey as an EU Member State Candidate: Evolving the Cosmopolitan Enlightened HyperCitizen European Union in WORLD COMPLEXITY SCIENCE ACADEMY JOURNAL, Vol. 1 Issue 3,14
30. Pitasi A. (2012), ‘Systemic Shifts in Sociology’, in Mancini G. and Pitasi A.(eds) Systemic Shifts in Sociology, Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken.
31. Pitasi A. and Ferone E. (2008), Il tempo zero del desiderio. McGrawHill, Milano.
32. Pitasi A. (2011), Le Monde Hyperhumain. L’Harmattan, Paris-Turin.
33. Pitasi A. (2012a), ‘What is sociology for?’ in World Futures Journal 68, 221-224.
34. Pitasi A. (2012b), ‘Hypercitizenship and the Management of Genetic Diversity, Sociology of Law and the Key Systemic Bifurcation Between the Ring Singularity and the Neofeudal Age’, in World Futures Journal 68, 314- 331.
35. Pitasi A. (2013), ‘The Hypercitizenship Challenge to Methodological Nationalism’, REDES - Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade, Centro Universitário La Salle - UniLasalle.
36. Plüss C. (2013), ‘Migrants Social Positioning and inequalities. The Intersections of Capitals, Locations and Aspirations’, in International Sociology, 28(1), 4-11.
37. Renan E. (1996) ‘What is a Nation?’ in Eley G. and Suny R.G. (ed.) 1996, Becoming National, A Reader, Oxford University Press New York and Oxford, 41-55. See especially pP. 52-54.
38. Rickards J. (2012), Currency Wars, the making of the next global crisis. Penguin, London.
39. Rose N. (2009), La politica della vita. Einaudi, Turin.
40. Smith LC.( 2011) The World in 2050. Penguin, London.
41. Stepanic J., Sabol G. and Zebec M.S. (2005), Describing Social Systems using free social Energy and social entropy in Kybernetes 34(6), 857-868.
42. Teubner G.(2012), Nuovi conflitti costituzionali. Bruno Mondadori, Milano
43. Thornill C.(2016), A Sociology of Transnational Constitutions, Social Foundations of the Post-National Legal Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
44. Toffler A. and Toffler H. (2006), Reviolutionary Wealth. Doubleday, London.
45. Triffin R. (1990), Dollaro, euro, moneta mondiale. Il Mulino, Bologna
46. Xiaoying Q. (2012). ‘A Case Study of Globalized Knowledge Flows, Guanxi in Social Science and Management Theory’ in International Sociology 27(6) 707-723.
Поступила в редакцию 2020-09-15
Опубликована 2021-06-18
Раздел
Политология. Международные отношения
Страницы
195-204